Writing high school assignments in troff puts your an ubernerd status, which I am slightly envious of ;-)

I agree generally that there needs to be a cap on damages.

It seems to me that if I were building a VPN client like Global Protect but using WG, I'd have an eternal per client auth key that is used to set up an initial tunnel to the VPN controller, over that you perform auth, etc, then you're given another session key, which is valid as long as that session is. The first tunnel would disconnect as soon as you finished authenticating and got your actual session key.

I dont get why people elsewhere on this thread are so up in arms about it - it seems like a perfectly reasonable interpretation of federal law, consistent with other kinds of civil claims.

Tying the ability to recover damages not to the date of the action that caused the loss, but rather to when you discovered the loss seems more reasonable.

Looks like he did update a reference to it.

https://hachyderm.io/@rsc/111307163277337129