Serious question here. Is this law more or less stating that the business gets no revenue back from local or state government? I have no issue with the argument that internet service is a basic right but if that is the case, I would expect the government to either offer the service or pay a market/agreed price to cover the cost for low income users.

National retail ISPs should not exist. All Internet should be municipal broadband that should be subsidized or free by the state.

I welcome any ISP who is unhappy about this giving back the broadband infrastructure that governments have already subsidized and paid for as well as given legal monopolies to by, for example, banning municipal broadband.

I also welcome eminent domain to solve this problem.

Not accounting for government-produced inflation is interesting.

I wonder if city could sue Federal government for printing money and causing such consequences?

Reminder that deflation should be occurring with the benefits of automation technology, where the buying power of the dollar should be increasing.

Is this like everyone has the right for a bank account?

In Germany public libraries have free internet access, I rarely see people there though (and in libraries in general, they have the most expensive magazines to read for free!)

$15 for 25Mb/s? And the ISPs are still complaining?????